F.A.I.R: In The Red For Affordable Housing, City Owes Wheeler Fund Millions
August 5th, 2008 at 05:54pm Post Staff 43
[Editor's Note: This news coverage has been underwritten by Factual Aspen Investigative Reporting (F.A.I.R.). F.A.I.R. has been formed and organized in Aspen, Colorado, as a nonprofit corporation to conduct investigative journalism in the public interest, and to provide accurate, meaningful and non-biased news coverage based on correct factual information.]
ASPEN (Post Time News)—Even a city like Aspen, known for affluence and excess, can flat run out of money when it comes
to funding affordable housing.
One solution: to borrow money in the municipal bond market in part to pay back the millions you just borrowed from your
own internal funds.
After spending more money than the City had in the bank to bank land for its 32-year-old affordable housing program, the
City of Aspen was compelled to borrow $8 million from the Wheeler Opera House fund to help finance more than $35 million
in land purchases. The City may be forced to borrow millions more from the City-owned Wheeler to pay off the outstanding balance, according to Aspen Finance Director Don Taylor.
“Additional amounts may have to be borrowed from Wheeler fund in 2008 to cover the 18,000,000 that was spent in 2007
on the BMC West lumber yard,” according to an email from Taylor. “It will depend on the RETT actual collections and what
happens with the bond issue.”
The RETT fund as of July 29, 2008, was just over $1.3 million, according to City of Aspen Community Relations Officer Sally
Spaulding.
“It is unusual for a city to get so over-leveraged in its funding,” former City Finance Director Paul Menter told Post Time News,
“in anticipation of voter approval on a bond issue.”
Translation: without the passage of such a bond for tens of millions of dollars in debt by voters in November 2008, the City
will not have nearly enough money in its affordable housing coffers to pay off the internal Wheeler loan until more tax money flows from the Real Estate Transfer Tax (RETT) and a portion of the City sales tax dedicated to affordable housing. The RETT fund in particular is coming under pressure after the $35 million land acquisitions—and the loan from the Wheeler—but should a bond pass in November 2008, payments in interest and principal will have to come out of the RETT/sales tax affordable housing fund for the 30-year life of the bond.
Any future bonds to pay for affordable housing, a real possibility according to Aspen Mayor Mick Ireland, would also be paid for by the RETT and sales tax over the life of the bond.
The funding complications come at a time when the RETT is facing a year-to-date plunge of 37 percent because of the weakening
real estate market in Pitkin County. Through June, the RETT generated a mere $3.023 million in 2008, compared to the more
robust $4.793 million generated from January-June 2007.
The near-term City of Aspen land purchases amount to $35.045 million, according to Community Relations Officer Spaulding, including $5.4 million for the property at 488 Castle Creek; $3.6 million for 312 West Hyman; $3.69 million for 802 West Main Street; $4.105 million for 517 Park Circle; and the controversial $18.25 million for the BMC West lumber yards. Sitting in the upstairs lounge of the historic Wheeler Opera House, Wheeler executive director Gram Slaton, addressing the $8 million loan to the City for affordable housing, told Post Time News he has been “assured we will be paid back in full within 24 months.”
The Wheeler, with $25 million in its fund, lent the affordable housing fund $8 million, leaving it with some $17 million in available funds as of July 2008. The Wheeler itself needs access to its own fund because it has ambitious expansion plans and has already issued a Request For Proposal (RFP) to architects bidding on the expansion.
“If the council approves issuance of bonds for reimbursement for previous land acquisitions,” City Finance Director Taylor
told Post Time News in an email, “that money will be used to pay back the Wheeler fund.”
How will the City pay back the Wheeler fund if the bond is postponed or fails?
“Over time,” Taylor responded via the same email, “from future Housing Fund [RETT plus sales tax] revenues.”
By all accounts such internal municipal borrowing, approved by Aspen City Council, is legal and not unprecedented. The
method has been used three times before to pay for street paving, for the Aspen Recreational Center (ARC), and for the Red Brick Center, with the City so far paying the money back as promised: $1.4 million for street paving; $1.35 million for the Asset
Management Fund; and $680,000 for the Red Brick West End Expansion. Finally, in 2007, the Wheeler Transfer Tax Fund loaned the affordable housing fund the aforementioned $8 million. The loan bears interest, according to the City, “at a rate, changing
monthly, equal to the monthly rate of return on the City’s investment portfolio, with annual principal and interest payments due through December 31, 2008.”
In this latest Wheeler loan, according to the City: “Proceeds from the loan were used for capital expenditures related to the acquisition of In The Red For Affordable Housing, City Of Aspen Owes Wheeler Millions real property for affordable housing purposes.”
The borrowing from the Wheeler for affordable housing—an order of magnitude larger than the $1 million-plus loans from the Opera House fund that came before—was initiated because the City had exceeded revenues available from the RETT and the portion of the sales tax devoted to affordable housing at a time when the City was anxious to bank land for affordable housing. The RETT was approved by voters to fund (a) affordable housing; and (b) the maintenance and operation of the Wheeler.
One advantage of such an arrangement to the City is that it can initiate the loan without paying any fees. But it also means
the City might be forced to use a portion of the proceeds from the proposed municipal bond to pay back the Wheeler fund—in effect, to borrow more money to pay back a minimum of $8 million borrowed from the Wheeler in the first place.
“Using the Wheeler fund is a way of circumventing the will of the people,” said the chairman of the Citizens Budget Task Force’s housing committee, Ward Hauenstein, speaking only for himself. “They’re not supposed to use it for anything else. Doesn’t that seem to be sidestepping the intended use of that fund? They’re borrowing it with every intention of paying it back so it’s not a violation. But it’s borrowing money to buy a new car and then saying you have to give me a raise because I just bought a new car.”
The City has yet to specify a bond amount, but if the bond were $50 million, for example, it would take a minimum of 16 percent of the bond to pay off what the City owes to the Opera House. That means only the remaining portion of the bond will still be available to pay for Phases II and III of the controversial Burlingame affordable housing complex—the focal point for such funding after the City came up tens of millions of dollars short of its published estimates of what it would take to finish the project.
Please help fund F.A.I.R . F.A.I.R is a registered 501 c.3 non-profit organization, and your contribution is tax deductible.
Please contact Bill Dinsmoor/MainstreetBakery@comcast.net • Roger Marolt/Roger@maroltlp.com • Tim Semrau/ TSemrau@sopris.net
Contributions to; F.A.I.R c/o Marolt LLC • 230 S. Mill, Aspen, CO 81611
Entry Filed under: Aspen, Post Time News, Affordable Housing
















4 Comments Add your own
1. Wharf Rat | August 6th, 2008 at 3:10 pm
[F.A.I.R. has been formed and organized in Aspen, Colorado, as a nonprofit corporation to conduct investigative journalism in the public interest, and to provide accurate, meaningful and non-biased news coverage based on correct factual information.]
Let me see if I have this right....
This article is written by some person named Post Time News, edited by some person named Editor, and posted by some person named Post Staff.
Seems pretty F.A.I.R. and B.A.L.A.N.C.E.D. (But Aspen Loves Another New Con Every Day). Or is it???? Bill, Roger, Tim, can you get right on this please?
2. Michael Conniff | August 6th, 2008 at 4:03 pm
Rat:
You have an uncanny, unerring ability to miss the point, but I am grateful you care enough to comment.
Post Time News is a unit of Post Time Media Inc., the publisher of Aspen Post, Snowmass Post, Skiing Post, and Fractional Post. I'm the chairman and CEO of Post Time Media and the founder as well.
Post Time News is actually the third news service I've established in my career: one in media, one in sports, and now this one in news. FAIR paid for this story, and the plan is for FAIR to raise enough money so we can in effect hire a fulltime reporter at City Hall. My guess is (fingers crossed) this could happen within the month.
On the subject of bylines, my model is Reuters, an old client of mine in a project called Reuter TV 2000 in which yours truly was the lead consultant. Reuters remains stingy about bylines. The idea behind NOT having a byline is to have the news organization present a consistent, coherent front. The name of the reporter is not a secret, just not germane.
By way of background, back in the day newspapers and news organization were far more selective about giving bylines. You could work for years without getting one. Now they give them to anyone who shows up.
I like the old-fashioned way better.
As for missing the point: have you no comment on the story itself? Even for you, I have to believe killing the messenger can get old.
Best, Michael!
3. Wharf Rat | August 6th, 2008 at 5:26 pm
I believe I was making a point, so I don't think I missed it. Try on all the hats, and you will see my angle.
4. Post Staff | August 7th, 2008 at 6:34 am
[Editor's Note: The following is a letter to the editor written by Paul Menter, former Aspen City Finance Director, in reaction to the Post Time News story (above) underwritten by F.A.I.R.]
This letter provides a little additional information regarding FAIR’s paid advertisement/article on page 10 of Wednesday’s Daily News, hopefully making FAIR even more, err, complete.
In addressing the city’s $8 million interfund loan from the Wheeler to finance property acquisitions made during 2007, the article quotes me as saying that it is “unusual” for cities to get so leveraged in anticipation of a bond issue.
Like ”unusual” is a bad thing in Aspen!
The quote is accurate but not complete. What’s missing is the part where I explained to the writer that this short term debt was planned by the City Council. They went into it knowing its risks and potential rewards. In the long run the loan has NO negative impact on the Wheeler fund, which earns interest on the loan at the same rate as its invested assets.
The real issue is that before the city makes any commitment to building a second theatre, the council should decide its priorities. Does it want more arts or lower taxes? Or, perhaps neither?
The endowment fund, created by council ordinance in 2002, is supposed to provide perpetual funding for the Wheeler Opera House when its RETT tax expires at the end of 2018 — now a mere 10 years away. Current operating and maintenance cost estimates to support the one existing Wheeler theatre place the endowment principal target at a minimum of $70 million. Its current balance is just south of $24 million.
Is it possible to get to $70 million? Yes, but only if RETT revenues recover to historic norms and there are no unforeseen capital improvement needs in the current 100-plus-year-old building.
By generating $3 million in income annually, and in combination with other self generated revenue, $70 million should be just enough to cover all of the Wheeler’s operating expenses from year to year; $80 million would be better.
However, if you take $15-$20 million of these funds and use them to build a second theatre, you get the “double whammy.”
First whammy: You decimate the endowment, taking its value down to under $10 million, eliminating its ability to generate earnings and grow to previously forecast levels. This happens even if you finance the second theatre. Resources previously dedicated to the endowment go to pay principal and interest on a bond issue or some other financing instrument, again reducing the endowment’s ability to grow.
Second whammy: You create a second theatre, the cost of which to operate may be lower than the current 100-plus-year-old building, but still high enough to require an operating subsidy. You can count on that.
Result? Now you cannot eliminate the Wheeler RETT — one purpose of the proposed endowment. You most likely must increase the current tax rate to cover the increase in operations, maintenance, and long term facility improvements.
The moral of this story? Internal bickering over an $8 million interfund loan is chicken feed. The important decision lies in the future of the endowment or the creation of a second theatre. You can’t have both, and in point of fact you may not be able to have either. Without strong RETT collections over the coming 10 years the endowment is in jeopardy, and a new theatre will certainly require an increase in subsidy. Pick your poison, ummm priority. More arts or lower taxes!
Paul W. Menter
Former City of Aspen Finance Director
Current Finance Director for Aspen Community Foundation
Leave a Comment
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Trackback this post | Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed